SHERSHER v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff could recover restitution from a manufacturer even though the product was purchased from a third-party retailer
• concluding that plaintiff who purchased product from defendant's retailer adequately alleged entitlement to restitution because defendant indirectly acquired plaintiff's money
• finding that an employer may be 18 liable for misappropriation of tips despite the fact that the tips were given to and 19 retained by different employees
• UCL unfair competition claims 14 may not “seek the return of money or property in which the plaintiff never had an ownership 15 interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-03-10· cited 197×
• In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.
  N.D. California· 2018-03-05· cited 65×
• County of San Bernardino v. Walsh
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-12-27· cited 57×
• Asghari v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2013-11-04· cited 46×
• In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-03-20· cited 45×
• M&F Fishing, Inc. v. Sea-Pac Insurance Managers, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-01-30· cited 37×
• Montich v. Miele USA, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2012-03-27· cited 36×
• Von Koenig v. Snapple Beverage Corp.
  E.D. California· 2010-05-10· cited 26×
• In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., Litigation
  D. Arizona· 2017-06-13· cited 11×
• Abbott Labs. v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty.
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-05-31· cited 9×
• Sisley v. Sprint Communications Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-07-02· cited 3×
• Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-12-09· cited 2×
• Zhang v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-10-29· cited 1×
• Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-07-25· cited 1×
• People v. Sarpas
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-05-06
• Abbott Laboratories v. Super. Ct.
  California Court of Appeal· 2018-05-31
• Abbott Laboratories v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2018-06-27
• Peviani v. Arbors at California Oaks Property Owner
  California Court of Appeal· 2021-04-06

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1999-04-08· cited 1,311×
• Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 2003-03-03· cited 855×
• Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.
  California Supreme Court· 1972-05-10· cited 404×
• Kasky v. Nike, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2002-05-02· cited 394×
• Kasky v. Nike, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2003-01-10· cited 218×
• Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-02-28· cited 194×
• Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 187×
• First Nationwide Savings v. Perry
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-12-03· cited 122×
• People v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1973-04-05· cited 120×
• Madrid v. Perot Systems Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-05-26· cited 80×
• Alch v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-09-14· cited 61×
• County of Solano v. Vallejo Redevelopment Agency
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-10-28· cited 56×
• Feitelberg v. Credit Suisse First Boston, LLC
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-12-09· cited 52×
• Blakemore v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-05-06· cited 43×
• Hirsch v. Bank of America
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-03-28· cited 38×