SHERSHER v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff could recover restitution from a manufacturer even though the product was purchased from a third-party retailer
• concluding that plaintiff who purchased product from defendant's retailer adequately alleged entitlement to restitution because defendant indirectly acquired plaintiff's money
• finding that an employer may be 18 liable for misappropriation of tips despite the fact that the tips were given to and 19 retained by different employees
• UCL unfair competition claims 14 may not “seek the return of money or property in which the plaintiff never had an ownership 15 interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).