Hirsch v. Bank of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff failed to allege restitution injury where the money expended in processing and mailing forms did not benefit the defendants
• concluding that the plaintiff in a UCL action my obtain restitution from a defendant with whom the plaintiff did not deal directly where that defendant received the benefit
• reversing the lower court’s dismissal of plaintiffs unjust enrichment claim upon finding that appellants stated a valid cause of action for unjust enrichment
• “To confer a benefit, it is not essential that money be paid directly to the recipient by the party seeking restitution.”
• upholding cause of action for unjust enrichment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).