Skip to main content
· 9/14/2004

Alch v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 29
  • 122 Cal. App. 4th 339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that age discrimination against employees under FEHA constitutes an unlawful business practice under the UCL
  • holding that age discrimination against employees under FEHA constitutes an unlawful business practice under the UCL
  • holding that age discrimination against employees under FEHA constitutes an unlawful business practice under the UCL
  • “The fundamental issue to be decided is whether FEHA’s one-year statute of limitations prevents non-applicant writers (deterred applicants) from prosecuting a claim....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.