· 9/14/2004
Alch v. Superior Court
Citations
- 19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 29
- 122 Cal. App. 4th 339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that age discrimination against employees under FEHA constitutes an unlawful business practice under the UCL
- holding that age discrimination against employees under FEHA constitutes an unlawful business practice under the UCL
- holding that age discrimination against employees under FEHA constitutes an unlawful business practice under the UCL
- “The fundamental issue to be decided is whether FEHA’s one-year statute of limitations prevents non-applicant writers (deterred applicants) from prosecuting a claim....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.