Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 8/17/1990

Sher v. Johnson

Citations

  • 911 F.2d 1357
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 14221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that partners “have potential liability” based on their stake in the partnership “but they are independent for jurisdictional purposes”
  • holding that tort claims relating to the 4 alleged incompetence of the plaintiff’s attorneys arose out of the plaintiff’s contractual 5 relationship with them
  • explaining that, without more, out-of-state contacts by mail and phone and payments sent from forum state did not establish “the deliberate creation of a ‘substantial connection’” with the forum state
  • finding no purposeful availment in the course of negotiations when defendant “is solicited in its home state and takes no affirmative action to promote business within the forum state”
  • “For purposes of personal jurisdiction, the actions of an agent are attributable to the principal.”
  • “For 22 purposes of personal jurisdiction, the actions of an agent are attributable to the principal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.