· 3/17/1986
Mitchell B. Haisten, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Jean E. Haisten v. Grass Valley Medical Reimbursement Fund, Ltd.
Citations
- 784 F.2d 1392
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23052
- 54 U.S.L.W. 2485
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the cause of action must arise out of forum-related activities for specific 18 jurisdiction to attach
- holding that the defendant purposefully availed itself of the forum state despite “no physical contacts between the forum state and the defendant”
- recognizing “the strong state interest in regulating insurance which concerns the ‘lives and limbs’ of the public”
- recognizing “the strong state interest in regulating insurance which concerns the ‘lives and limbs’ of the public”
- finding that a defendant had 3 purposefully interjected oneself into California’s affairs because the defendant purposefully directed 4 activity at California residents
- finding purposeful availment where defendant had no physical contact with forum, but insured forum residents
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Choy, Skopil, Schroeder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.