Skip to main content
· 8/23/1988

Frank Sinatra v. National Enquirer, Inc., and Clinic La Prairie, S.A.

Citations

  • 854 F.2d 1191
  • 15 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1949
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11582
  • 1988 WL 86524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a Swiss clinic’s tortious conduct was partly intended to avail it of California’s market
  • advertising, misappropriation of a name, and knowledge that misappropriation will injure a California resident in California
  • soliciting and conducting business in California can show purposeful 5 availment
  • defendant maintained an agent in California, advertised heavily there, and considered California a top source of American clients
  • “The continuing contacts between the [Swiss] [c]linic’s United States-based agent and California translate into less of a litigation burden than if the Clinic maintained no physical presence or agent within the United States.”
  • \The continuing contacts between the [Swiss] [c]linic's United States-based agent and California translate into less of a litigation burden than if the Clinic maintained no physical presence or agent within the United States.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Nelson, Muecke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.