Sixth Circuit· 2/13/2003

Sharpe v. Cureton

Citations

319 F.3d 259
2003 WL 297019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

Holding that a continuing violation is a continuous, ongoing series of discriminatory behavior and involves “unlawful employment practices that cannot be said to occur on any particular day, but occur over a series of days or years.”
holding that the second Dixon category “is not implicated by Morgan”
explaining that under the continuing violation doctrine, the court can consider as timely all relevant violations “including those that would otherwise be time[-]barred”
explaining that the first category of continuing violations “cannot be said to occur on any particular day, but occur over a series of days or years”
noting that hostile environment claims can qualify as continuing violations because they “cannot be said to occur on any particular day, but occur over a series of days or years”
holding that Morgan has foreclosed the serial-violations theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batchelder, Forester, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Sharpe v. Cureton

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.