Mallory v. Eyrich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a prima facie disparate impact discrimination case requires a showing that the challenged policy caused \a significant disparate impact on a protected group\
• explaining that a prima facie disparate impact discrimination case requires a showing that the challenged policy caused “a significant disparate impact on a protected group”
• stating a disparate impact plaintiff must prove her favored remedy would not have a “similarly undesirable [discriminatory] effect” on hiring
• statistics not probative because they did not take into account qualifications for the jobs available
• statistics not probative because they did not take into account qualifications for the jobs available
• “A claim of disparate impact, unlike a claim of disparate treatment, does not require a finding of intentional discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).