Federal Claims· 2/11/2008
Sharp v. United States
Citations
- 80 Fed. Cl. 422
- 2008 U.S. Claims LEXIS 32
- 2008 WL 384177
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the government’s argument that the Tucker Act’s reference to a singular “Act” of Congress requires a stand-alone provision that is money-mandating
- “[B]oth [the USCFC] and the Federal Circuit have found Tucker Act jurisdiction in cases in which the money-mandating ‘separate source of substantive law’ was a statutory scheme rather than a single statutory provision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2016-11-10· cited 20×
- Anderson v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-01-28· cited 6×
- Sharp v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-06-12· cited 3×
- Sharp v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-03-01· cited 3×
- Szuggar v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2019-10-28
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 3,086×
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 2,686×
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 2,368×
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court· 1988-12-12· cited 2,039×
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court· 2000-05-01· cited 2,025×
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,685×
- Fisher v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2005-03-09· cited 1,462×
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court· 1984-06-26· cited 1,423×
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court· 1955-04-04· cited 1,032×
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court· 1991-03-20· cited 867×
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court· 1982-04-05· cited 841×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1991-03-26· cited 770×
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-02-19· cited 768×
- United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court· 2003-03-04· cited 738×
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court· 1976-06-07· cited 674×
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 658×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.