Sharp v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mindful of Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 26(l)(b) (1982), the court expressly provided that the “plaintiffs’ rights to bring further actions to recover amounts improperly deducted after June 30, 2008” shall not be prejudiced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sharp v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2009-08-26· cited 52×
• PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2008-10-16· cited 10×
• Sharp v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2010-03-01· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
• Skidmore v. Swift & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
• United States v. Mead Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 3,086×
• Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 2,387×
• Christensen v. Harris County
  Supreme Court· 2000-05-01· cited 2,025×
• Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission
  Supreme Court· 1991-03-20· cited 867×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.
  Supreme Court· 1991-03-26· cited 770×
• Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2005-09-09· cited 226×
• Sharp v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2008-02-11· cited 5×