Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/4/1951

Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.

Citations

  • 341 U.S. 384
  • 71 S. Ct. 745
  • 95 L. Ed. 2d 1035
  • 1951 U.S. LEXIS 2491
  • 60 Ohio Law. Abs. 81

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “doubts of the opposition” do not guide “the construction of legislation”
  • construing a statute to reflect “continuity” between the Senate bill ultimately enacted and prior draft legislation
  • construing a statute to reflect “continuity” between the Senate bill ultimately enacted and prior draft legislation
  • invalidating Louisiana law providing that buyer would not resell except at price stipulated by vendor
  • \It is the sponsors that we look to when the meaning of the statutory words is in doubt.\
  • “Resort to legislative history is only justified where the face of the Act is inescapably ambiguous....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Jackson, Frankfurter, Minton, Black, Burton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

474 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.