Supreme Court· 6/4/1951
Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.
Citations
- 341 U.S. 384
- 71 S. Ct. 745
- 95 L. Ed. 2d 1035
- 1951 U.S. LEXIS 2491
- 60 Ohio Law. Abs. 81
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “doubts of the opposition” do not guide “the construction of legislation”
- construing a statute to reflect “continuity” between the Senate bill ultimately enacted and prior draft legislation
- construing a statute to reflect “continuity” between the Senate bill ultimately enacted and prior draft legislation
- invalidating Louisiana law providing that buyer would not resell except at price stipulated by vendor
- \It is the sponsors that we look to when the meaning of the statutory words is in doubt.\
- “Resort to legislative history is only justified where the face of the Act is inescapably ambiguous....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Douglas, Jackson, Frankfurter, Minton, Black, Burton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
474 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 1,936×
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyNinth Circuit· 2006-04-04· cited 1,756×
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court· 1977-04-04· cited 1,460×
- Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSeventh Circuit· 1994-04-08· cited 1,356×
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 1,251×
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-03-03· cited 1,194×
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court· 1988-04-20· cited 1,067×
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-05-03· cited 953×
- Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court· 2018-05-21· cited 946×
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1965-01-25· cited 912×
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-03-03· cited 855×
- Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-02-19· cited 768×
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court· 1978-03-29· cited 703×
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-06-15· cited 683×
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 609×
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1967-04-17· cited 595×
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1956-06-11· cited 594×
- Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 563×
- New York State Department of Social Services v. DublinoSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 558×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 2,153×
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 1,730×
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court· 1951-02-26· cited 537×
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court· 1936-12-07· cited 349×
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court· 1885-03-16· cited 342×
- Commissioner v. Estate of ChurchSupreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 281×
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 259×
- Radice v. People of New YorkSupreme Court· 1924-03-17· cited 185×
- Schwegmann Brothers v. Calvert Distillers Corp. Schwegmann Brothers v. Seagram Distillers CorpFifth Circuit· 1950-09-15· cited 11×
- Pepsodent Co. v. Krauss Co.E.D. Louisiana· 1944-08-24· cited 4×
Other cases named Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.