Skip to main content

Sharp v. State

Citations

  • 970 N.E.2d 647
  • 2012 WL 2401637
  • 2012 Ind. LEXIS 522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that credit time status may be considered by an appellate court exercising its review and revise authority
  • holding that a defendant who molested step-son on multiple occasions over a period of years was in a position of care, and therefore, serious penal consequences were warranted
  • holding that “evaluation of a defendant’s sentence may include consideration of the defendant’s credit time status because this penal consequence was within the contemplation of the trial court when it was determining the defendant’s sentence”
  • concluding that defendant’s sentence of forty years was not inappropriate despite his status as a credit-restricted felon where he was convicted of two counts of molesting his step-son, one by deviate sexual conduct and the other by fondling
  • noting victim’s testimony that defendant molested him “about every other weekend” for the two years preceding October 2008 provided sufficient evidence to infer defendant molested him after June 30, 2008
  • credit-time status a penal consequence within contemplation of the sentencing court and thus properly reviewable under App. R. 7(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Sullivan, Rucker, David, Massa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.