Skip to main content
· 4/12/2024

Kevin Hamilton v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “monitoring the defendant's compliance with court orders and enforcing the remedy are generally compensable as part of the underlying case.”
  • finding that district court retained jurisdiction where Stipulation of Dismissal explicitly \incorporated\ settlement agreement and provided that \this Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement.\
  • affirming a district court's ability to expressly retain jurisdiction and order the enforcement of a settlement agreement
  • “[T]he district court did not clearly err in finding that there was an oral agreement or in concluding that it retained jurisdiction over the enforcement of the settlement agreement, regardless of its form.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.