D.C. Circuit· 12/4/2007
Shankar v. ACS-GSI
Citations
- 258 F. App'x 344
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the plaintiff had conceded an issue by failing to respond to an argument made by the defendant in a dispositive motion
- holding that plaintiff conceded the merits of an issue when he “did not respond in any way to defendant's argument” on that issue in his opposition before the district court
- affirming the district court’s granting of summary judgment for the defendant where appellant had conceded his claims
- declining to “resolve the merits of [an] issue because [plaintiff] conceded it” by failing to “respond in any way to defendant’s argument”
- plaintiff conceded merits of issue when he “did not respond in any way to defendant’s argument”
- plaintiff conceded the merits of an issue when he “did not respond in any way to defendant’s argument”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garland, Rogers, Silberman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict of Columbia· 2012-10-17· cited 130×
- Muttitt v. United States Central CommandDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-04· cited 59×
- Brookens v. SolisDistrict of Columbia· 2009-05-21· cited 28×
- Marshall v. PotterDistrict of Columbia· 2009-07-14· cited 24×
- Miles v. University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-16· cited 19×
- Moore v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-02-05· cited 18×
- St. John v. NapolitanoDistrict of Columbia· 2013-11-05· cited 11×
- Hayes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-07· cited 11×
- Ratley v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2013-07-18· cited 1×
- Brookens v. ChaoDistrict of Columbia· 2009-05-21
- Stand Up for California! v. U.S. Department of the InteriorDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-06
- Harrington v. Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 2022-01-20
- Hayes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2022-07-19
- J.Q.R. v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict of Columbia· 2022-08-17
- Ashbourne v. HansberryDistrict of Columbia· 2024-07-18
- Jackson v. MayorkasDistrict of Columbia· 2024-09-27
- Neguse v. U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementDistrict of Columbia· 2025-12-17
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.