Ellipso Inc. v. Mann, John B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming this Court’s preliminary injunction because Mann Tech had not shown that Ellipso knew of Patterson’s dual-roles before Ellipso affirmed the loan agreement
• refusing to consider arguments made on appeal that were not presented to District Court in opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction
• affirming an injunction against selling shares in a case based on fraudulent inducement to contract, where those shares were the only known asset from which judgment could be satisfied
• “Where a party to an executed contract discovers a material misrepresentation ..., that party may ... either affirm the contract and sue for damages, or repudiate the contract and recover that with which he or she has parted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. United States Navy
  D.C. Circuit· 2012-11-02· cited 70×
• Feinerman v. Bernardi
  District of Columbia· 2008-06-12· cited 39×
• Belbacha v. Bush
  D.C. Circuit· 2008-03-14· cited 34×
• Ellipso, Inc. v. Mann
  District of Columbia· 2008-04-01· cited 28×
• Shankar v. ACS-GSI
  D.C. Circuit· 2007-12-04· cited 19×
• Majhor v. Kempthorne
  District of Columbia· 2007-10-30· cited 18×
• Sununu v. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC.
  District of Columbia· 2011-06-20· cited 16×
• In Re Estate of Reilly
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-10-11· cited 10×
• Ellipso, Inc. v. Mann
  District of Columbia· 2008-09-30· cited 7×
• TD INTERN., LLC v. Steven K. Fleischmann
  District of Columbia· 2009-08-04· cited 6×
• Barroca v. Hurwitz
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-09-28· cited 6×
• Live365, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board
  District of Columbia· 2010-02-23· cited 5×
• Carter v. Urban Serv. Sys. Corp.
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-08-13· cited 4×
• Robertson v. Cartinhour
  D.C. Circuit· 2011-04-19· cited 3×
• Ellipso, Inc. v. Mann
  District of Columbia· 2009-01-29· cited 2×
• Strobos v. Rxbio, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2016-12-27· cited 2×
• Sununu v. Philippine Airlines
  District of Columbia· 2011-06-20
• Holub v. United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys
  District of Columbia· 2009-10-12
• Td International, LLC v. Fleischmann
  District of Columbia· 2009-08-05
• Barroca v. Samuels
  District of Columbia· 2018-09-28

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 1977-07-05· cited 870×
• Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 621×
• Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1940-12-09· cited 498×
• Serono Labs Inc v. Ferring Pharm. Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 1998-10-27· cited 293×
• District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation v. Air Florida, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-12-28· cited 248×
• Transohio Savings Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision
  D.C. Circuit· 1993-01-05· cited 240×
• Atlas Life Insurance v. W. I. Southern, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1939-04-17· cited 130×
• Connecticut General Life Insurance Company v. New Images Of Beverly Hills
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-03-03· cited 130×
• Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,925 in the Matter of Fred August Quenzer and Jamie Quenzer, Debtors. Fred August Quenzer and Jamie Quenzer v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-11-30· cited 72×
• Harriet Alicke v. MCI Communications Corporation
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-04-29· cited 69×
• Dean v. Garland
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-30· cited 18×