Ellipso Inc. v. Mann, John B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming this Court’s preliminary injunction because Mann Tech had not shown that Ellipso knew of Patterson’s dual-roles before Ellipso affirmed the loan agreement
• refusing to consider arguments made on appeal that were not presented to District Court in opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction
• affirming an injunction against selling shares in a case based on fraudulent inducement to contract, where those shares were the only known asset from which judgment could be satisfied
• “Where a party to an executed contract discovers a material misrepresentation ..., that party may ... either affirm the contract and sue for damages, or repudiate the contract and recover that with which he or she has parted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).