Greenhill, Frances v. Spellings, Margaret

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Court of Federal Claims had “exclusive” jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claim that government had breached settlement agreement reached after plaintiff filed discrimination complaints with EEOC
• explaining that lower courts may “consider supplemental material filed by a pro se litigant in order to clarify the precise claims being urged”
• explaining that lower courts may “consider supplemental material filed by a pro se litigant in order to clarify the precise claims being urged”
• explaining that lower courts may “consider supplemental material filed by a pro se litigant in order to clarify the precise claims being urged”
• explaining that lower courts may “consider supplemental material filed by a pro se litigant in order to clarify the precise claims being urged”
• noting that the D.C. Circuit has “permitted courts to consider supplemental material filed by a pro se litigant in order to clarify the precise claims being urged”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).