Muttitt v. United States Central Command

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the only scenario in which a court can properly grant relief to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA
• “[T]he only relief required by the FOIA with regard to expedited processing is moving an individual’s request ‘to the front of the agency’s processing queue.’” (quotation omitted)
• “Even when a plaintiff does not challenge the segregability efforts of an agency, the Court has an affirmative duty to consider the segregability issue sua sponte.” (quotation omitted)
• “Even when a plaintiff does not challenge the segregability efforts of an agency, the Court has an affirmative duty to consider the segregability issue sua sponte.” (quotation omitted)
• “Even when a plaintiff does not challenge the segregability efforts of an agency, the Court has an affirmative duty to consider the segregability issue sua sponte.” (quotation omitted)
• “In order for its response to be ‘complete,’ an agency need not . . . obtain a judicial declaration that its search efforts were adequate or that its withholding determinations were warranted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).