Shambaugh v. Steadfast Ins

Oral argument

• Argued

  41 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that first step in specific jurisdiction analysis is determining “whether the defendant has minimum contacts with the forum state”
• noting that forfeiture “generally will not apply ‘when [an issue] fairly appears in the record as having been raised or decided’”
• an insurer’s securing an insurance contract with a Texas resident is insufficient to establish specific personal jurisdiction over the insurer
• “[I]f complaint allegations alone prevented subsequent forfeiture, then it is difficult to imagine when any claim or argument could ever be forfeited.”
• “The mere fact that a defendant participated in state court lawsuits in the putative forum, without more, cannot meet this court’s standard for specific personal jurisdiction.” (citation omitted)
• “[T]his court considers arguments forfeited if they are not raised before a magistrate judge, even if they are subsequently raised before the reviewing district court in objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Quintanilla
  Fifth Circuit· 2024-08-30· cited 16×
• Savoie v. Pritchard
  Fifth Circuit· 2024-11-25· cited 16×
• Stanley v. Morgan
  Fifth Circuit· 2024-10-28· cited 11×
• Janvey v. GMAG
  Fifth Circuit· 2024-03-20· cited 4×
• Hardy v. Scandinavian Airline Sys
  Fifth Circuit· 2024-08-26· cited 4×
• Barr v. SEC
  Fifth Circuit· 2024-08-30· cited 3×
• Shahrashoob v. Texas A&M University
  Fifth Circuit· 2025-01-08

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Olano
  Supreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
• Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
• Johnson v. Zerbst
  Supreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
• World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
• Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. Brown
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 4,319×
• Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 2,597×
• Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.
  Supreme Court· 2017-06-19· cited 2,355×
• Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.
  Supreme Court· 2021-03-25· cited 1,735×
• Yee v. City of Escondido
  Supreme Court· 1992-04-01· cited 953×
• Rollins v. Home Depot USA
  Fifth Circuit· 2021-08-09· cited 400×
• Lytle v. Household Manufacturing, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1990-03-20· cited 346×
• Monkton Ins Services, Limited v. William Ritter
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-09-26· cited 274×
• Latshaw v. Johnston
  Fifth Circuit· 1999-02-05· cited 215×
• Hamer v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi.
  Supreme Court· 2017-11-08· cited 209×
• Milton Eugene Cupit v. John P. Whitley, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-09-12· cited 178×
• Halliburton Energy Servs., Inc. v. Ironshore Specialty Ins. Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 2019-04-17· cited 173×
• United States v. Connie C. Armstrong
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-02-11· cited 159×
• Germano v. Taishan Gypsum Co.
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-01-28· cited 152×
• Cycles, Ltd. v. W.J. Digby, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1989-12-06· cited 95×
• Taishan Gypsum Co. v. Gross
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-05-20· cited 87×