United States v. Connie C. Armstrong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that issues first raised in objections to a magistrate judge’s findings are not properly before the court
• concluding that issues first argued in “objections to the magistrate judge’s findings” were “not properly before the district court” and refusing to address them
• holding issues first raised in objections to magistrate’s report and recommendation need not be considered by the district court
• holding issues raised for the first time in objection to the magistrate judge’s findings, conclusions and recommendations are not properly before the district court
• stating that issues raised for the first time in objections to magistrate judge’s report are not properly before the court
• stating that issues raised for the first time in objections to magistrate judge’s report are not properly before the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).