Skip to main content

Shakes v. State

Citations

  • 185 So. 3d 679
  • 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1745
  • 2016 WL 519907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In addition, the trial court never entered a written finding of competency, further indicating that the trial court did not make an independent competency determination.”
  • “To the extent that the trial court relied on defense counsel’s representation that Shakes was competent, such reliance is not permitted.”
  • \[T]he trial court did not ... make an independent determination of competency ... [and] gave no indication that it had reviewed the report submitted by the psychologist.\
  • \[T]he trial court did not ... make an independent determination of competency ... [and] gave no indication that it had reviewed the report submitted by the psychologist.\
  • “[T]he trial court did not . . . make an independent determination of competency . . . [and] gave no indication that it had reviewed the report submitted by the psychologist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altenbernd, Khouzam, Morris, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.