Skip to main content

MacAluso v. State

Citations

  • 12 So. 3d 914
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9161
  • 2009 WL 1940502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court failed to make proper competency determination where defense counsel advised the court that defendant’s-competency had been restored and the trial court, without further hearing or evidence, declared defendant competent and proceeded with trial
  • holding that the trial court improperly decided the competency issue where defense counsel advised the court that the defendant’s competency had been restored, and the trial courfr-without further hearing or evidence — declared defendant competent to proceed
  • “If the Rule wanted lawyers to be able to stipulate to restored competency without an evidentiary hearing, it would have so stated in explicit terms.”
  • “If the Rule wanted lawyers to be able to stipulate to restored competency without an evidentiary hearing, it would have so stated in explicit terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farmer, Hazouri, Gerber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.