Vestal v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• having concluded that a “mental examination of [defendant] was necessary to determine if she was competent to proceed ...” the trial court was required to follow the prescribed procedure and hold a competency hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dortch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-04· cited 22×
• Shakes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-10· cited 17×
• Bennie John Ross v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-02-02· cited 15×
• Campos-Carriera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-04· cited 4×
• Burns v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-17
• VERNSON EDWARD DORTCH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-04
• Hammonds v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-28

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Samson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-10· cited 26×
• Carrion v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-21· cited 18×
• Hicks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-09· cited 16×
• Maxwell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-01· cited 11×
• Cochran v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-03· cited 10×
• Blackmon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-16· cited 5×