Corbitt v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when defendant has been adjudicated incompetent, applicable rule requires court to enter written order finding defendant restored to competency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Molina v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-08· cited 32×
• Shakes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-10· cited 17×
• Holland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-05· cited 14×
• Hampton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-18· cited 11×
• Boone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-09· cited 9×
• Carroll v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-30· cited 7×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-24· cited 5×
• Francis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-24· cited 4×
• Razuri v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-21· cited 4×
• Childs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-22· cited 3×
• Hampton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-25· cited 1×
• Hampton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-06· cited 1×
• D.Y. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-03-28

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Marshall v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-11-02· cited 4×
• Chmielewski v. First Union National Bank of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-22· cited 1×