Settles v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It was within the trial court’s discretion to find that [the defendant’s] rehabilitation process during his incarceration was not a significant mitigating factor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Padgett v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-10-23· cited 12×
• Mead v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-10-23· cited 8×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Buchanan v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-05-10· cited 165×
• Powell v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-06-18· cited 54×
• Charlton v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-07· cited 45×
• Buchanan v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-09-04· cited 44×
• Bailey v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-03-12· cited 37×
• Johnson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-03-29· cited 28×
• Vasquez v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-11-16· cited 18×
• Benton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-02-05· cited 10×