Indiana Court of Appeals· 10/23/2007
Mead v. State
Citations
- 875 N.E.2d 304
- 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 2354
- 2007 WL 3071988
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the trial court possesses the ability to directly observe the defendant and is therefore in the best position to determine whether the defendant is genuinely remorseful
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friedlander, Riley, Sharpnack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Buchanan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-05-10· cited 165×
- Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-11-09· cited 114×
- Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-20· cited 71×
- Moshenek v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-20· cited 57×
- Corralez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-10-06· cited 43×
- Gray v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-06-19· cited 21×
- Moyer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-09-23· cited 14×
- Westbrook v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-06-25· cited 8×
- Cruite v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-31· cited 8×
- Jackson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-08-23· cited 6×
- Roberts v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-10-05· cited 5×
- Beatty v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-09-26· cited 5×
- Settles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-07-17· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.