Skip to main content

Benton v. State

Citations

  • 691 N.E.2d 459
  • 1998 Ind. App. LEXIS 85
  • 1998 WL 43263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that appellant failed to set forth state double jeopardy claim by merely referencing Article I, Section 14, without providing separate analysis of state double jeopardy claim or argument as to why it provided protection different from federal constitution
  • noting when a defendant places his or her identity at issue, it is within the trial court’s discretion to admit Rule 404(b) evidence
  • although bodily injury is an element of burglary, “the viciousness with which the injury was inflicted” could be considered as an aggravating circumstance to enhance the sentence
  • although bodily injury is an element of burglary, “the viciousness with which the injury was inflicted” could be considered as an aggravating circumstance to enhance the sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Hoffman, Garrard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.