Indiana Court of Appeals· 2/26/2003
Seide v. State
Citations
- 784 N.E.2d 974
- 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 301
- 2003 WL 550110
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that the defendant failed to show any sort of double jeopardy violation for enhancing six different crimes committed with the aid of the same weapon used six times
- rejecting defendant’s attempt to equate case law regarding double jeopardy violations based on enhancement of two convictions based on the same bodily injury with enhancements based on the use of the same weapon
- “Though the same weapon may have been involved, it was used six times to commit six offenses.”
- confinement lasted over four hours
- confinement lasted over four hours
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Riley, Mathias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 824×
- Pierce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-29· cited 119×
- Hollowell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-03-25· cited 106×
- Hopkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-12-20· cited 92×
- Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-11-16· cited 70×
- Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-10-10· cited 64×
- Charlton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-07· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.