Benavides v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the recording as a whole must be “intelligible enough to be probative of the purpose for which it is being offered”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Buchanan v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-01-23· cited 21×
• Lee v. Hamilton
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-01-30· cited 6×
• Williams v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-07-22· cited 5×
• Mitzy J. Romero v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-05-31· cited 1×
• Andrew J. Lessing v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-04-08

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spivey v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-01-29· cited 273×
• Krise v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-05-09· cited 125×
• Hopkins v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-12-20· cited 92×
• Carpenter v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2003-04-14· cited 90×
• Lamar v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1972-05-25· cited 79×
• Dearman v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-03-09· cited 47×
• Coleman v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-07-05· cited 44×
• Lahr v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-10-05· cited 28×
• Allen v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-05-05· cited 24×
• Highbaugh v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-08-15· cited 17×
• Kidd v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-11-16· cited 16×
• Seide v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-02-26· cited 9×
• Paul v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 7×
• Roller v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-11-05· cited 5×