Skip to main content

Sears v. State

Citations

  • 426 S.E.2d 553
  • 262 Ga. 805
  • 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 768
  • 1993 Ga. LEXIS 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that any analysis regarding whether recusal is required is “necessarily fact-bound”
  • explaining that any analysis regarding whether recusal is required is “necessarily fact-bound”
  • finding no reason to prohibit the State from running criminal background checks on prospective jurors
  • question is whether judge’s impartiality can be questioned reasonably, bearing in mind the reality that any judge will have had extensive contact with the community and local bar
  • question is whether judge’s impartiality can be questioned reasonably, bearing in mind the reality that any judge will have had extensive contact with the community and local bar
  • the term “private papers” refers to documents protected by a legal privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sears-Collins, Clarke, Benham, Fletcher, Hunstein, Hunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.