Skip to main content

Baptiste v. State

Citations

  • 494 S.E.2d 530
  • 229 Ga. App. 691
  • 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 4365
  • 1997 Ga. App. LEXIS 1434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that even when the defendant sued the trial judge in connection with the case before the judge, such suit did not provide grounds for recusal as it was not a statutory ground for recusal
  • finding Skomer distinguishable because the judge neither participated in plea negotiations nor stated what sentence would be imposed if the defendant rejected the plea offer and was convicted at trial
  • statement of seven U. S. Supreme Court Justices, noting concern about “ ‘strat-egizing’ recusals, that is, selecting law firms with an eye to producing the recusal of particular Justices”
  • “The fact that the judge has sat on prior cases of the party or ruled on prior matters in the case before the judge is legally insufficient as a ground! 1 for recusal.”
  • “[A] recusal issue may not be abused as an element of trial strategy”
  • “[A] recusal issue may not be abused as an element of trial strategy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Birdsong, Ruffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.