· 7/2/2002
Ellis v. Stanford
Citations
- 568 S.E.2d 157
- 256 Ga. App. 294
- 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2139
- 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 895
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Denials of motions to recuse are interlocutory in nature. An appeal of such an order requires compliance with the interlocutory appeal provisions of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).”
- an order denying a motion to recuse is an interlocutory order
- “Denials of motions to recuse are interlocutory in nature.”
- a claim for specific performance lies in equity
- a claim for specific performance lies in equity
- order denying motion to recuse is interlocutory
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mlkell, Andrews, Phipps
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.