Skip to main content
· 7/2/2002

Ellis v. Stanford

Citations

  • 568 S.E.2d 157
  • 256 Ga. App. 294
  • 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2139
  • 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Denials of motions to recuse are interlocutory in nature. An appeal of such an order requires compliance with the interlocutory appeal provisions of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).”
  • an order denying a motion to recuse is an interlocutory order
  • “Denials of motions to recuse are interlocutory in nature.”
  • a claim for specific performance lies in equity
  • a claim for specific performance lies in equity
  • order denying motion to recuse is interlocutory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mlkell, Andrews, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.