Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 6/13/2003

Sealed v. Sealed

Citations

  • 332 F.3d 51
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 11720
  • 2003 WL 21363384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-101(a) “creates no discrete rights or reasonable expectations in any specific protective measures” and therefore “does not create ‘entitlements’ that receive constitutional protection under the Fourteenth Amendment”
  • noting that certification may be appropriate if other “factors strongly suggest that [courts] defer to the Connecticut Supreme Court”
  • discussing how federal courts “may ordinarily interpret ambiguous state statutes using the normal rules of statutory interpretation, even in the absence of controlling state authority”
  • if the administrative scheme “does not require a certain outcome, but merely authorizes particular actions and remedies, the scheme does not create ‘entitlements’ that receive constitutional protection”
  • “Where the administrative scheme does not require a certain outcome, but merely authorizes particular actions and remedies, the scheme does not create ‘entitlements’ that receive constitutional protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.”
  • certification favored where question of state law “implicates the weighing of policy 16 concerns”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, Straub, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Sealed v. Sealed

41 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.