Skip to main content

Scull v. State

Citations

  • 569 So. 2d 1251
  • 1990 WL 176999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that when “the appearance of irregularity so permeates [a sentencing proceeding] as to justify suspicion of unfairness,” there has been “a violation of due process” that entitles the defendant to a new sentencing hearing
  • describing “due process” in sentencing context as embodying “a fundamental conception of fairness that derives ultimately from the natural rights of all individuals” and ordering a new sentencing to cure due-process violation
  • \The essence of due process is that fair notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard must be given to interested parties before judgment - 10 - is rendered.\ (citing Tibbets v. Olson, 108 So. 679, 688 (Fla. 1926) (Whitfield, J., concurring))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.