Skip to main content
· 1/4/2010

Sinni v. Scottsdale Insurance

Citations

  • 676 F. Supp. 2d 1319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding exclusion precluded coverage for employee who slipped and fell on pathway to parking lot after finishing work
  • finding exceptional circumstances warranted relieving the insurer of its duty to defend
  • “In Florida, a party seeking to recover under a Coblentz agreement must prove: (1) coverage; (2) a wrongful refusal to defend; and (3) that the settlement was objectively reasonable and made in good faith.”
  • where the actual facts revealed there was “no question” the injured party was on the premises as an employee, the insurer had no duty to indemnify as a matter of law
  • “In exceptionally rare cases, however, where the complaint omits a reference to an uncontroverted fact that, if pled, would have clearly placed the claim outside the scope of coverage, equity may relieve an insurer from its duty to defend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory A. Presnell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.