· 1/4/2010
Sinni v. Scottsdale Insurance
Citations
- 676 F. Supp. 2d 1319
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding exclusion precluded coverage for employee who slipped and fell on pathway to parking lot after finishing work
- finding exceptional circumstances warranted relieving the insurer of its duty to defend
- “In Florida, a party seeking to recover under a Coblentz agreement must prove: (1) coverage; (2) a wrongful refusal to defend; and (3) that the settlement was objectively reasonable and made in good faith.”
- where the actual facts revealed there was “no question” the injured party was on the premises as an employee, the insurer had no duty to indemnify as a matter of law
- “In exceptionally rare cases, however, where the complaint omits a reference to an uncontroverted fact that, if pled, would have clearly placed the claim outside the scope of coverage, equity may relieve an insurer from its duty to defend.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gregory A. Presnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.