Skip to main content

Walls v. State

Citations

  • 580 So. 2d 131
  • 1991 WL 50583

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The state and its agents clearly are entitled to watch a person in custody and make notes of that person's voluntary or spontaneous behavior or comments.\
  • “Due process contemplates that the police and other state agents act in an accusatorial, not an inquisitorial, manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.