Anton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a- defendant’s. judgments and sentences become final upon the issuance of the appellate court’s mandate
• holding that a defendant’s judgments and sentences become final upon the issuance of the appellate court’s mandate
• expressly rejecting the contention that the trial court's actions on remand in correcting a judgment were an extension of the \direct review proceedings\
• expressly rejecting the contention that the trial court’s actions on remand in correcting a judgment were an extension of the “direct review proceedings”
• “Under Florida law, it is appellate court action—i.e., the issuance of the mandate—that returns jurisdiction to the trial court.”
• expressly rejecting the contention that the trial court’s actions on remand in correcting a judgment were an extension of the “direct review proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).