Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 593 N.E.2d 198
  • 1992 Ind. LEXIS 161
  • 1992 WL 126622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant requesting the assistance of an expert at public expense must explain why an expert witness is necessary and would help the defense
  • noting that ‘‘trial courts . . . are in the position of both ensuring that defendants receive fair trials and preventing limited resources from being used unnecessarily’’
  • comparing Webb v. Baird, 6 Ind. 13 (1854), with Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938), and Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963
  • failure to provide defendant with blood spatter expert in a death penalty ease was reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DeBRULER, Dickson, Giyan, Krahulik, Shepard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.