Skip to main content
· 9/22/1998

Kriner v. State

Citations

  • 699 N.E.2d 659
  • 1998 Ind. LEXIS 407
  • 1998 WL 656079

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the “well established principle that jury instructions should not single out” specific evidence or comment upon the weight or consideration to be given to specific evidence
  • “[c]ircumstantial evidence by its nature is a web of facts in which no single strand may be dispositive”
  • “[c]ircumstantial evidence by its nature is a web of facts in which no single strand may be dispositive”
  • “trace evidence expert would have testified [about] ... blood and glass”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.