Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 613 So. 2d 569
  • 1993 WL 25620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that court had inherent power to assist true owner in recovery of property held in custodia legis-, separate suit for replevin or conversion was not necessary
  • stating that a defendant is not required to file a separate suit for replevin or conversion when seeking to recover property seized in connection with his or her case
  • comparing a trial court’s denial of a motion for return of property after the State disclaimed knowledge of certain items which a defendant claimed were seized to “the granting of summary judgment while disputed facts remain unresolved”
  • a separate suit for replevin or conversion is not necessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.