Wilson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]f the court dismisses the motion [for return of property] as facially insufficient, it shall identify the deficiencies and grant [mov-ant] leave to amend within a reasonable time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-18· cited 3×
• Scott Arel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-03-18· cited 2×
• Malcolm N. Peterson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-18· cited 2×
• Miguel A/K/A Angel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-21· cited 1×
• Watkins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-18· cited 1×
• Shuler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-27

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bolden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23· cited 31×
• Scott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-17· cited 12×
• Justice v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-22· cited 9×
• Cloud v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-14· cited 9×
• Sarmiento v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-22· cited 4×
• Harkless v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-23· cited 3×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-07· cited 2×
• Reed v. City of Clearwater
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-16· cited 1×