Skip to main content

Scott v. State

Citations

  • 465 A.2d 1126
  • 297 Md. 235
  • 1983 Md. LEXIS 298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the type of evidence admissible pursuant to the sentencing statutory scheme in a death penalty case is generally more restricted than evidence admissible at sentencing in a non-death penalty case
  • rejecting on state-statutory and federal constitutional grounds the use of evidence of unadjudicated offenses during capital sentencing
  • “[A] statute should be construed so that all of its parts are given effect and harmonized if possible____”
  • admission of evidence of prior murders for which defendant charged but not convicted, at penalty phase, constituted reversible error
  • “Custody statutes are considered in pari materia to statutes with related subject matter.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson, Rodowsky, Couch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.