Skip to main content

Cook v. State

Citations

  • 369 So. 2d 1251

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring proof of criminal conviction to rebut analogous mitigating factor under Alabama statute
  • aggravating circumstance of pecuniary gain should not be applied to murder during a robbery
  • applying pecuniary gain aggravator to a situation already condemned under robbery aggravator inappropriate
  • defendants are presumed innocent until convicted — this fundamental tenet prohibits use against an individual of unproven charges in the life or death situation presented at the sentencing stage of a capital trial
  • dual application of robbery-murder and pecuniary gain aggravators “in effect condemn[s] [the defendant] twice for the same culpable act — stealing money”
  • \robbery\ and \pecuniary gain\ factors overlap, \in effect condemning Cook twice for the same culpable act — stealing money\ and so pecuniary gain factor cannot be considered by trial judge who under statute determines sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Faulkner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.