S.D. California· 5/3/2010
Scott v. Napolitano
Citations
- 717 F. Supp. 2d 1071
- 23 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 165
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42882
- 2010 WL 1797032
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that an employer does not violate the ADA by conducting a narrowly tailored mental examination where there is a reasonable concern about an employee’s mental health, but finding the particular questions posed to be broader and more intrusive than necessary
- recognizing that an employer does not violate the ADA by conducting a narrowly tailored mental examination where there is a reasonable concern about an employee’s mental health, but finding the particular questions posed to be broader and more intrusive than necessary
- finding that supervisor’s disparaging comments about employee’s mental health did not violate ADA where supervisor “had a personal vendetta against” employee and “did not actually believe that [employee] was disabled as a result of a mental condition” (emphasis in original)
- “ If [defendant] mistakenly thought Plaintiff was opposing discrimination prohibited by Title VII, Plaintiff arguably would have a retaliation claim under Title VII.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lee v. City of Columbus, OhioSixth Circuit· 2011-02-23· cited 107×
- Velma Bates v. Dura Automotive Systems, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2014-08-26· cited 35×
- Miller v. Whirlpool Corp.N.D. Ohio· 2011-08-12· cited 5×
- Ellis A. Archerda v. Department of DefenseMerit Systems Protection Board· 2014-07-11· cited 1×
- Psak v. JewellDistrict of Columbia· 2020-06-01
- Ellis v. San Francisco State UniversityN.D. California· 2015-12-22
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1999-06-22· cited 1,876×
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nNinth Circuit· 1987-02-05· cited 1,643×
- Freeman v. ArpaioNinth Circuit· 1997-09-09· cited 541×
- Gregory Fogleman v. Mercy Hospital, IncThird Circuit· 2002-03-18· cited 380×
- Richard A. Sullivan v. River Valley School District, and Charles O. Williams, Superintendent, Individually and in His Official CapacitySixth Circuit· 1999-11-29· cited 247×
- Stephan Pardi v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsNinth Circuit· 2004-11-15· cited 227×
- Tice v. Centre Area Transportation AuthorityThird Circuit· 2001-04-23· cited 166×
- Sandra Silver v. Kca, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1978-11-13· cited 133×
- Walton v. U.S. Marshals ServiceNinth Circuit· 2007-06-26· cited 131×
- Joseph B. Taylor v. Pathmark Stores, IncThird Circuit· 1999-05-19· cited 130×
- Metoyer v. ChassmanNinth Circuit· 2007-09-26· cited 127×
- Stephen D. Learned v. City of BellevueNinth Circuit· 1988-11-03· cited 117×
- Cripe v. City of San JoseNinth Circuit· 2001-08-17· cited 113×
- Pamella E. Settlegoode v. Portland Public Schools, Multnomah School District No.1 Susan Winthrop Robert Crebo Larry WhitsonNinth Circuit· 2004-06-09· cited 94×
- January Fredenburg v. Contra Costa County Department of Health ServicesNinth Circuit· 1999-04-19· cited 76×
- Watson v. City of Miami BeachEleventh Circuit· 1999-05-28· cited 69×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellee v. Dinuba Medical Clinic, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 2000-08-24· cited 62×
Other cases named Scott v. Napolitano
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.