Skip to main content
S.D. California· 5/3/2010

Scott v. Napolitano

Citations

  • 717 F. Supp. 2d 1071
  • 23 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 165
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42882
  • 2010 WL 1797032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an employer does not violate the ADA by conducting a narrowly tailored mental examination where there is a reasonable concern about an employee’s mental health, but finding the particular questions posed to be broader and more intrusive than necessary
  • recognizing that an employer does not violate the ADA by conducting a narrowly tailored mental examination where there is a reasonable concern about an employee’s mental health, but finding the particular questions posed to be broader and more intrusive than necessary
  • finding that supervisor’s disparaging comments about employee’s mental health did not violate ADA where supervisor “had a personal vendetta against” employee and “did not actually believe that [employee] was disabled as a result of a mental condition” (emphasis in original)
  • “ If [defendant] mistakenly thought Plaintiff was opposing discrimination prohibited by Title VII, Plaintiff arguably would have a retaliation claim under Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barry Ted Moskowitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Scott v. Napolitano

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.