Walton v. U.S. Marshals Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an expert affidavit failed to create a factual dispute because the expert did “not state a factual basis for his opinion”
• holding that an expert affidavit failed to create a factual dispute because the expert did “not state a factual basis for his opinion”
• noting that “the standards of substantive liability” under the 24 ADA are incorporated in the Rehabilitation Act
• relying in part on the interpretation of regarded-as in Sutton , which the ADAAA explicitly superceded
• relying in part on the interpretation of regarded-as in Sutton, which the ADAAA explicitly superceded
• relying in part on the interpretation of regarded-as in Sutton, which the ADAAA explicitly superceded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).