Gregory Fogleman v. Mercy Hospital, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court’s interpretation of Age Discrimination in Employment Act is relevant to interpreting Title VII
• addressing different theories of indi- vidual and third-party retaliation under Americans with Dis- abilities Act, among others, as distinct theories of retaliation
• applying retaliation principles taken from actions under the National Labor Relations Act to an ADA retaliation case
• “[W]e generally assume that the best evidence of Congress’s intent is what it says in the texts of the statutes.”
• AWhat is relevant is that the applicant, whether Muslim or not, was treated worse than he otherwise would have been for reasons prohibited by the statute.@
• \the PHRA is to be interpreted as identical to federal anti-discrimination laws except where there is something specifically different in its language requiring that it be treated differently\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).