Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there can be no extracontraetual recovery in the context of an ERISA plan
• “[W]hen it is possible to offer a reasoned explanation, based on evidence for a particular outcome, the outcome is not arbitrary and capricious.”
• “[W]hen it is possible to offer a reasoned explanation, based on evidence for a particular outcome, the outcome is not arbitrary and capricious.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1997-09-15· cited 706×
• Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel
  Eleventh Circuit· 1991-01-29· cited 385×
• Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
  Sixth Circuit· 1991-02-15· cited 349×
• Linda Gail Calvert v. Firstar Finance, Inc., F/k/a Star Bank Corporation, and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
  First Circuit· 2005-05-17· cited 280×
• Robert Cromwell v. Equicor-Equitable Hca Corp.
  Sixth Circuit· 1991-09-11· cited 277×
• University Hospitals of Cleveland v. Emerson Electric Company and Emerson Electric Company Benefit Plan
  Sixth Circuit· 2000-03-03· cited 197×
• Bartling v. Fruehauf Corp.
  Sixth Circuit· 1994-09-23· cited 125×
• Cooke v. Manufactured Homes, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 1993-07-09· cited 110×
• In Re Nationsmart Corporation Securities Litigation
  Eighth Circuit· 1998-01-15· cited 106×
• Twiss v. Kury
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-07-20· cited 98×
• Adrian Freeman v. Laventhol & Horwath
  Sixth Circuit· 1990-09-17· cited 97×
• Blumel v. Mylander
  M.D. Florida· 1996-03-12· cited 97×
• Walco Investments, Inc. v. Thenen
  S.D. Florida· 1996-06-27· cited 66×
• Clarence Wells v. United States Steel & Carnegie Pension Fund, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1992-01-30· cited 65×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,874 First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. And Jack K. Naber v. Roy I. Pring and Central Bank and Trust Company of Denver
  First Circuit· 1992-07-08· cited 65×
• Home Ins. Co. v. Rice
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1991-08-02· cited 61×
• In Re Sahlen & Associates, Inc. Securities Litigation
  S.D. Florida· 1991-07-10· cited 59×
• In Re Enron Corp. Securities
  S.D. Texas· 2006-06-05· cited 55×
• Frank M. Ockerman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, (92-5265) v. May Zima & Company, (92-5266)
  Sixth Circuit· 1994-06-28· cited 53×
• Shields v. Reader's Digest Ass'n
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-06-09· cited 52×

Other cases named Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd.
  Supreme Court· 1990-04-23
• Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd.
  Supreme Court· 1990-04-23