Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,874 First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. And Jack K. Naber v. Roy I. Pring and Central Bank and Trust Company of Denver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that allegations that a defendant had the ability to exert control over the circumstances of the primary violation, i.e., indirect control, are sufficient to state a claim under Section 20(a)
• alleged aider and abettor’s silence indicated conscious intent to aid the primary violation where aider and abettor had “substantial personal stake” in success of allegedly fraudulent bond issue
• “the language of the statute leads us to join those circuits that hold that a plaintiff need not prove that the defendant actually or culpably participated in the primary violation.”
• \[T]he language of the statute causes us to reject those decisions that may be read to require a plaintiff to show the defendant actually or culpably participated in the primary violation.\
• “[T]he language of the statute causes us to reject those decisions that may be read to require a plaintiff to show the defendant actually or culpably participated in the primary violation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).