Court of Appeals of Virginia· 3/29/2011

Scott v. Commonwealth

Citations

707 S.E.2d 17
58 Va. App. 35
2011 Va. App. LEXIS 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant’s motion to strike the evidence as to one charge did “not also function as a motion to strike” as to another charge
holding that an argument made in a motion to strike challenging only the sufficiency of the evidence to support first-degree murder failed to preserve a sufficiency challenge to the lesser-included charge of involuntary manslaughter
holding that an argument made in a motion to strike challenging only the sufficiency of the evidence to support first-degree murder failed to preserve a sufficiency challenge to the lesser-included charge of involuntary manslaughter
holding the defendant’s motion to strike the evidence as to one charge did “not also function as a motion to strike” as to another charge
holding the defendant’s motion to strike the evidence as to one charge did “not also function as a motion to strike” as to another charge
holding the defendant’s motion to strike the evidence as to one charge did “not also function as a motion to strike” as to another charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haley, Petty, Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Scott v. Commonwealth

50 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.