Skip to main content

Scott v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 323 S.E.2d 572
  • 228 Va. 519
  • 1984 Va. LEXIS 326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that intent to make the victim watch him “blow his brains out” was equivalent to intent to deprive of liberty
  • recognizing that “in rape, robbery, and assault cases there is usually some [intrinsic] detention . . . of the victim”
  • noting that the intention to persuade someone to have sexual intercourse is not the equivalent of the intent to defile
  • noting that the intention to persuade someone to have sexual intercourse is not the equivalent of the intent to defile
  • holding that where evidence of other bad acts or crimes is relevant, an accused is not entitled “to have the evidence ‘sanitized’ so as to deny the jury knowledge of all but the immediate crime for which he is on trial”
  • holding that statutory abduction requires no proof of asportation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.