Scott v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “significant decrease in husband’s income” was a material change in circumstances
• “The ICAOS Rules are binding in the compacting states and thus have the force and effect of law.”
• Ohio courts lacked jurisdiction to revoke offender’s Virginia probation under the ICSAO

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Miller
  Superior Court of The Virgin Islands· 2010-05-04· cited 2×
• Lewis v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-06-07

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Durfee v. Duke
  Supreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 677×
• Nevada v. Hall
  Supreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 510×
• Bloodworth v. Ellis
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1980-06-06· cited 48×
• Peppers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-02· cited 6×